Don't be shy, let's find out once and for all if Killoggs is a Red Site or a Blue Site.
Members and Troll... I mean regular responders are welcome to contribute
Post whom you voted for in the comments. And for the sake of clarity, please, be nice and argue your positions in other posts. There are already like 100 different posts about the election. I, myself, promise to withhold all crankery, buffoonery, snideness, insults, etc. So should you.
rick [email] said at 2:57 PM 11-02-2004: Ralph Nader. Hopefully, the third time's a charm. Though I think it WOULD be a sign of the Endtimes if he won.
brianbibbly [email] said at 3:32 PM 11-02-2004: I am holding back my crankery, buffoonery, snideness, insults, etc. But I want to unleash them upon you soooooooooo bad.
kiche [email] said at 6:07 PM 11-02-2004: rick, your vote is a symbolic act of solidarity with those people whom you share a vision of our future. and you told all of us an the world today that this is your vision of our future:
click on it so you can see a nice big version of your message.
and yes, that is a real ad, taken directly off his website.
jesus, could you have voted for badnarik or cobb, or somebody else who's not crazy?
rick [email] said at 6:10 PM 11-02-2004: I thought about voting for Badnarik seeing as he is, in my opinion, more realistic on Social Security but I thought I would go with "seagreen integrity" and vote for Nader. Certainly he has it as opposed to the other two guys.
kiche [email] said at 6:13 PM 11-02-2004: dude, look at that picture. then go look at those videos of him debating dolls.
not only did he take money from republicans and become an integral party of the re-elect bush strategy, when i looked at his website i slowly realized that he also let the republicans direct his campaign. even when they directed it in directions that made fun of him. i can't believe that you chose this boobery.
rick [email] said at 6:17 PM 11-02-2004: Please. What if he takes money from Republicans? Tom DeLay could write me a checque and I would be happy to cash it if I were running for office. As for the dolls; it may not be my sort of thing but I am sure there are people who found it funny.
You may call it boobery but the fact I find his boobery more appealing than a lot of the outright chicanery that the two frontrunners throw forth.
rick [email] said at 6:42 PM 11-02-2004: Nader is on the ballot in thirty-five states. Michael Badnarik is on the ballot in forty-eight states including all but one "Battleground" states.
rick [email] said at 6:52 PM 11-02-2004: As for using Republican help in running his campaign, if that were true ( I am not sure if it is, though I would not be surprised if he had some registered Republicans working for his campaign) once again, what of it? If one wants to lure voters from the other side, why not get the ones most experienced in doing so? Besides, he likely has far more persons who were once Democrats working for him.
The thing is, I doubt I will ever vote for a major party in a national election because I just do not care for either party. Both of them have issues that raise my hackles. I lean toward the Democrats most times because the Republicans I find very often to be hostile towards individual rights but the Democrats irk me almost as much.
There has got to be a weakening of these parties. Even if Kerry gets elected with 50%+ ( which will be a first since 1988), he will be hampered by an every refractory Republican Congress. It used to be that the parties had a lot of elbow room for individual differences but that has gone out the door.
So, yeah. Unless any candidate from either party really speaks to me, then I could care less and I will vote for someone else even if they sold crack to schoolchildren to finance their campaign.
Howard Dean was the only Democrat I could have voted for; and the issue that made him popular I disagreed with on.
brandon [email] said at 8:22 PM 11-02-2004: You guys don't listen for shit.
Probably not going to Red Star tonight. Apparently, they accidentally double-booked victory at sea and Zack, and decided to go with both. I'm having an allergic reaction to something, so I won't venture out into the smokey haze.
Wade said at 2:59 PM 11-02-2004: I voted for Kerry in TX, but for Bush in LA and PA. I didn't vote in DC because, what's the point? So my net vote is Bush.
We actually had like seven presidential candidates to choose from. Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Green, Constitution, and Ralphie boy was listed as Progressive Independent or something
brianbibbly [email] said at 3:34 PM 11-02-2004: K-Dawg and that immigrant Jindal and Chris John because I hate Canada and would never accept their drugs.
Darryl X. said at 4:14 PM 11-02-2004: Walt Brown. But my wife voted Kerry. As did my mom, sister, brother in law, mother in law, father in law. So I felt I could play a bit.
Bob [ url ] said at 1:49 AM 11-03-2004: I've seen like the last fifteen minutes or so of "Bob Roberts"... though I still can't sing and play guitar at the same time without fucking up. I always did have problems multitasking.
On top of which, I have serious doubts about how appropriate it would be for a white guy like myself to represent this neighborhood.
Especially since I'll be moving to Canada once CNN calls Ohio for Bush...
kevin [email] said at 6:48 PM 11-02-2004: kerry/edwards. hopefully the high turnout bodes well for getting rid of bush. i'm thinking there is the possibility this could be a kerry blowout compared to the close race pollsters think is taking place.
neilbert said at 9:25 PM 11-02-2004: This has to be the stupidest post ever on killoggs. A more appropriate question would have been "Who did not vote for Kerry?" Me, I voted for Bush, although in vein as California is as whinny and liberal as killoggs.
neilbert said at 11:41 PM 11-02-2004: Holy Frijoles! Josh, you voted for Bush?! Where is Teddy to punish you for not voting for the "I have a plan" Kerry?
amanda [email] said at 10:14 PM 11-02-2004: Kerry, after 2 hours standing in the cold to get to the polls. We only had two old ladies working the entire district because they didn't expect this big of a turn-out based upon previous elections.
Feingold! My man cannot lose to Captain Insane-o, Tim Michels! Come on, Milwaukee and Madison; do your work and overpower religious right-redneckland!!!
Bob [ url ] said at 1:52 AM 11-03-2004: I did not vote for Kerry. This is because living in DC gives me the luxury of throwing away my vote. Kerry got like 90% here.
No, I did not vote for that turncoat Nader. I stuck to my Green guns and made my vote an even bigger waste: DAVID COBB!
meredith [email] said at 10:46 AM 11-03-2004: Yay for you!! I totally would have voted for Cobb had he gotten on the Illinois ballot. Instead I had to vote for Badnarik, as even Nader couldn't weasel his way on.
Baby Duck said at 10:18 PM 11-05-2004: Kerry. Moving from Denton County, TX for 2000 to Dallas County, TX for 2004, I mourned the lack of Libertarian and Green candidates in local races.
I truly wanted a "Concede to the Republicans, but not Bush" option.
