Killoggs : born with a hunched back

"You are an in-joke." - Josh, to Woody

ADVERTISMENTS:

call us:
206-350-1082

support killoggs!

jake

actually a caption contest

Best caption for each gets a shipment of cookies (photoshops are welcome too).

the things we leave behind

never poke a dragon in the eye

Is that where I come from, daddy?

these images are not work safe,
so I'm just posting the links...
also I can't edit all of them down to size,
so if someone wants to do this that would be nice...
Contest ends midnight Friday.

[ 52 responses ] < Photoshop Contest > < link >

[ posted by jake at 08/25/2004 02:24:29 PM ]
[ trackback ]

Threaded Responses [ bottom ]

josh [email] said at 2:49 PM 08-25-2004:
whoops i clicked on the second one before i read that they weren't work safe...

[Reply To this] [#125361]

meredith [email] said at 2:52 PM 08-25-2004:
I did the same thing with the first one, which wasn't too bad. I also think it's too perfect to be real and not set up.

[Reply To this] [#125366]

jake [email] said at 2:57 PM 08-25-2004:
Sorry--
I'm gonna repost the links for 2 and 3 now that I've cropped them down...

[Reply To this] [#125373]

jake [email] said at 2:56 PM 08-25-2004:
The things we leave behind

[Reply To this] [#125372]

meredith [email] said at 2:58 PM 08-25-2004:
See, there would be more smearage if that were real.

[Reply To this] [#125375]

jake [email] said at 3:04 PM 08-25-2004:
What if it's just an impression from the final collapse, and the hands to the left and right were the major points of leverage?

[Reply To this] [#125383]

meredith [email] said at 3:25 PM 08-25-2004:
Still, getting up would make smears. Also, there appears to be some kind of underwear or pants line.

[Reply To this] [#125404]

rick [email] said at 3:26 PM 08-25-2004:
Meredith from "CSI: CHICAGO"

[Reply To this] [#125407]

jake [email] said at 3:30 PM 08-25-2004:
There are smears on the handprints,
and the getting up could have been done mostly from the hands at top, with an assist at the waist,
and the beltline comes from the skirt that was flipped up in back.

Maybe.

[Reply To this] [#125409]

meredith [email] said at 3:33 PM 08-25-2004:
To me, it looks like the impression of pantyhose. Pantyhose that have not been removed. Notice the seam line decending into the crotch area.

[Reply To this] [#125413]

Woody said at 3:36 PM 08-25-2004:
Garter belt?

[Reply To this] [#125415] [ip: logged]

meredith [email] said at 3:37 PM 08-25-2004:
There would be additional lines down the thighs.

[Reply To this] [#125416]

meredith [email] said at 3:39 PM 08-25-2004:
And still wouldn't quite explain the crotch seam.

[Reply To this] [#125419]

julie [email] said at 5:01 PM 08-25-2004:
Clearly, stirrup pants.

[Reply To this] [#125458]

jake [email] said at 5:22 PM 08-25-2004:
I feel like I've got my own Ladies Club conversation, right here in my post.
And even Woody's involved.

[Reply To this] [#125470]

julie [email] said at 5:38 PM 08-25-2004:
Riiiiiight, cuz sleazy pics of women taking it up the ass are SO the hot topics of the LC.

[Reply To this] [#125476]

jake [email] said at 5:54 PM 08-25-2004:
eeek!
I was referring to the incisive analysis of seams, lines, and the garments that bear them...
not that other gross stuff.
Gosh!

[Reply To this] [#125480]

meredith [email] said at 5:56 PM 08-25-2004:
I don't know that the LC has ever even discussed panty lines.

[Reply To this] [#125481]

jake [email] said at 6:01 PM 08-25-2004:
There goes one of my fantasies.
pffft!
Meredith, you keep that needle away from the balloons of my desire!

[Reply To this] [#125485]

josh [email] said at 7:10 PM 08-25-2004:
It's so erotic when you say that, Julie.

[Reply To this] [#125500]

Woody said at 5:38 PM 08-26-2004:
Sleazy? You people truly do not know art.

[Reply To this] [#125838] [ip: logged]

myriam [email] said at 6:47 PM 08-25-2004:
I'm actually gonna guess gym shorts with a little string tie at the waist (untied).

[Reply To this] [#125498]

rick [email] said at 3:34 PM 08-25-2004:
Apparently, both of you moonlight as detectives on the vice squad.

[Reply To this] [#125414]

meredith [email] said at 3:38 PM 08-25-2004:
It's just obviously not real. First clue: too perfect.

[Reply To this] [#125418]

jake [email] said at 4:26 PM 08-25-2004:
So what's your theory of the case?
The lady found a dirty car,
and decided to lay against it for just a moment, simply to create a dirty picture?

What deranged mind would perpetrate such a scheme?

[Reply To this] [#125447]

kara [email] said at 4:36 PM 08-25-2004:
.....

[Reply To this] [#125450]

josh [email] said at 4:43 PM 08-25-2004:
Uhm, why did the guy photoshop the hitchiker into the WTC photo?

[Reply To this] [#125451]

jake [email] said at 5:10 PM 08-25-2004:
To process his rage and feeling of inadequacy through the experience of being adrift.

[Reply To this] [#125463]

meredith [email] said at 5:49 PM 08-25-2004:
I'm just going to giggle at you.

[Reply To this] [#125478]

jake [email] said at 2:58 PM 08-25-2004:
NOT WORK SAFE:
never poke a dragon in the eye

[Reply To this] [#125377]

jake [email] said at 3:00 PM 08-25-2004:
lest he raise up his head against you...
STILL NOT WORK SAFE

[Reply To this] [#125378]

jake [email] said at 6:05 PM 08-25-2004:
Dammit, I reversed the order of these!!

[Reply To this] [#125489]

jake [email] said at 3:03 PM 08-25-2004:
AND TOTALLY NOT WORK SAFE AT ALL:
is there another one in there, honey?

[Reply To this] [#125380]

kara [email] said at 3:11 PM 08-25-2004:
her panties are soaked she is hungry for a good stuffing

[Reply To this] [#125390]

jake [email] said at 3:12 PM 08-25-2004:
"Joey, get the hamburger helper for your mother!"

[Reply To this] [#125394]

kiche [email] said at 5:58 PM 08-25-2004:
sorry jake, it seems that ladyday81 has already beat us with the best line for that one:

[shakes head in discuss]

[Reply To this] [#125483]

jake [email] said at 6:17 PM 08-25-2004:
I hate that ladyday81.
Someday we'll get her. and her littly ladydog81 too.

[Reply To this] [#125491]

kiche [email] said at 9:59 PM 08-25-2004:
everyone's all down on this chick, there all like, "this is child neglect!!1!1!!11"

but i actually think this is a good thing. she's being pretty honest. this picture basically says: i wanna fuck like an animal but i think you should know that i have a kid.

our society needs more of this kind of honesty.

[Reply To this] [#125538]

cecil [email] said at 4:50 PM 08-25-2004:
Caption for all 3:

"Livejournal: proof that the bored are boring."

[Reply To this] [#125453]

jake [email] said at 5:11 PM 08-25-2004:
Very snide, Cecil Seaside.

[Reply To this] [#125465]

cecil [email] said at 5:22 PM 08-25-2004:
except for my 2 livejournals and everyone on my friends list

[Reply To this] [#125469]

jake [email] said at 5:27 PM 08-25-2004:
what do you do with 2?

[Reply To this] [#125472]

cecil [email] said at 5:34 PM 08-25-2004:
stalkers need multiple identities

[Reply To this] [#125474]

julie [email] said at 5:37 PM 08-25-2004:
they respond to each other's posts with effusive compliments.

[Reply To this] [#125475]

cecil [email] said at 5:42 PM 08-25-2004:
SHHHH

[Reply To this] [#125477]

yvonne [email] said at 5:14 PM 08-25-2004:
what is the lady doing in the last picture? i'm confused...

[Reply To this] [#125467]

jake [email] said at 5:23 PM 08-25-2004:
I think she's mugging for the camera.
While babysitting.
Or waiting for the brownies to cool.

[Reply To this] [#125471]

craig [email] said at 6:46 PM 08-25-2004:
I think the caption for all three should be, "WTF!11!! OMG!!11!!! LOLZ!!1111!!!11!111".

[Reply To this] [#125495]

myriam [email] said at 6:56 PM 08-25-2004:
HA HA HA HA teh w1nnar!

[Reply To this] [#125499]

jake [email] said at 8:16 PM 08-25-2004:
hmmm.
A little overstated for #1, but definitely appropriate for #3

[Reply To this] [#125515]

julie [email] said at 8:08 PM 08-25-2004:
first one: Eh, it would be sexy if it was any car other than a fucking Volvo. Where are the Camaros when you need them?

second one: Was that tattoo artist a male or a female, and did they charge the dude extra for all the obligatory ball-handling?

third one: the reason digital photography was invented. What did this poor family do when they had to take that roll to the 1-Hr Foto Booth!?!

[Reply To this] [#125511]

jake [email] said at 8:16 PM 08-25-2004:
What if it's somebody else's volvo.
Like the ex-boyfriend's.

[Reply To this] [#125514]