I'm not really going to get into the distribution of Radiohead's latest album because that's been pretty well covered every where else. Let's talk about the music.
In Rainbows is the best album Radiohead has ever made...
...this decade.
Honestly though, I had been debating whether or not to leave that sentence as is. There's a part of me that very much wants to make that statement and there are several reasons why. As great as they've been, I'm not totally sure if we've ever heard Thom Yorke and co. sound as relaxed and completely at ease as they do here. That doesn't mean that they've grown complacent either, they can't afford to.
The fact of the matter is there are plenty of other bands/acts that are of equal talent and perhaps even relevance. Wilco, OutKast, Bjork, Beck and the Flaming Lips are all part of Radiohead's particular generation and each have masterpieces of their own. Not to mention up and coming acts like Battles, TV on the Radio, Liars, Animal Collective and My Morning Jacket are all tugging on Radiohead's cape. That doesn't even take into account bands like Coldplay and Muse who both should send Radiohead a check for every album they release (I say this knowingly being a big Muse supporter.)
The point of all this is that as symbolic an album as Kid A was it's very quickly become somewhat dated. The artistic direction the band took with that album was pretty significant and they should be commended for so consciously abandoning that which established their stature in the first place. Kid A and Amnesiac both contain great music but the thing we really love Radiohead for in the first place isn't only great music but great songs. "Idioteque" and "National Anthem" are both pretty awesome but they lose their appeal once you try to find any emotional connection to them. "Optimistic" is good as well but its paranoia was better explored on just about every other Radiohead single that came before it.
Hail to the Thief saw the return to a more song-based album but perhaps one that was about two to four songs too long. It was also the first glimpse we received of a melding of the two sides of Radiohead. It was also the first spark of emotion to return to the band with melancholy being somewhat replaced by political outrage. I think the disappointment surrounding Thom Yorke's underrated solo outing, The Eraser, has more to do with its continued exploration of electronica than actual quality. I think as a companion piece to everything else Radiohead had done, The Eraser sits quite nicely. It's not a world-beater but we probably should not have expected it to be. The album's true importance, however, became significant last Wednesday.
The Eraser just may have been Thom Yorke's way of working on his own electronic tinkerings so that the rest of the band could get back to being just that, a band. As a band they could return to what they do best and better than most others, make songs. That's where the comfort comes in to play.
With this album Radiohead was free to just make an album. Their contract with Capitol had ended, there was no pressure to follow up one of the greatest albums ever and due largely to their own efforts the band's stature had somewhat diminished recently. Somewhere amongst all this Radiohead rememembered how to be a band again. On In Rainbows there's almost a playful tone to the album. Lyrically the song's aren't that different but tonally there's a huge difference. The angst, the anxiety, the paranoia, the melancholy all seem to be somewhat exorcised.
It's hard to explain. This album doesn't feel like any Radiohead album they've ever made but at least it feels like something. It's not cold and distant, it's warm and inviting like a cup of tea. The songs are just as long as they need to be and they're superbly textured. Shut out the rest of the world and listen to In Rainbows with a pair of headphones on and you'll see what I mean.
I still want very badly to say that In Rainbows is the best album Radiohead has ever made but I won't. Instead, I'll re-phrase the sentence with a different word that will lend it a different sort of gravitas. It's a word that seems to be the best fit for everything I said in the previous stanza. More importantly, it's a word that will set In Rainbows apart from the epic stature of either The Bends or OK Computer.
In Rainbows is the most intimate album the band has ever made. And for a band that's based an entire career on NOT being able to connect, that may be the greatest gesture ever.
reggie [email] said at 12:27 PM 10-16-2007: Crap, I forgot to mention how the Postal Service album kinda helped usurp some of Kid A's resonance by using electronica to make great -- and memorable -- pop music.
josh [email] said at 11:52 AM 10-17-2007: didnt that come out years later though? i feel like kid a came out forever ago. maybe it wasnt that long ago.
abby [email] said at 3:21 PM 10-16-2007: the second half of the album is weak, and i dont know that its something that needs to set it or whatever. ive always been partial to the often-performed and never-recorded "big ideas (dont get any)/nude" and hearing it all full and lush, sweeping, curling, is a dream come true. its a wonderful, perfect recording.
unfortunately i dont have any headphones here in the house of recovery, so im missing out on a lot of the texture, and on the apparently wicked bass.
reggie [email] said at 11:16 AM 10-17-2007: Really? I think it's solid from beginning to end with "Reckoner" being my favorite overall. Big fan of "Videotape" as well.
reggie [email] said at 6:34 PM 10-18-2007: Do you remember when Radiohead were playing two shows in Virginia when Kid A came out? It was raining like crazy that weekend and both shows had to be canceled, on the day of what would have been the 2nd show we (mainly he) spent all day calling the 9:30 Club to see if they may play a surprise show there. In the meantime all of us who were supposed to go were hanging out and listening to Kid A and/or watching Meeting People is Easy AND 7 Television Commercials.
abby [email] said at 11:03 PM 10-18-2007: yes in fact i do remember. my friend and i had big plans to go out to manasas, camp in the battlefield, and sneak into the show at nightfall. somehow. then i broke my leg.
julie [email] said at 11:18 PM 10-18-2007: I had tickets, and I sat in the car in that muddy field as it rained cats and dogs, spinning my car tires in the muck. Fuck, that sucked.
Also I once flew to England to see Radiohead at a 3-day outdoor music festival, by myself, knowing no one there. Can I be in the contest for biggest Radiohead fan?
julie [email] said at 12:21 AM 10-19-2007: Naw, I already had a passport. Abby, I never knew you were into Radiohead! I thought Reggie was the only Killogger who cared about them
abby [email] said at 1:54 PM 10-19-2007: for some reason it is something i like to keep a secret! in high school all i would do is download live shows (this of course took days) and smoke awful weed and listen to them through the night. and also i would look at the w.a.s.t.e. online store and worry about pounds to dollars conversions and salivate over t-shirts and sweaters and stuff. also once i emailed stanley donwood about using a short story of his on my old website and HE EMAILED ME BACK and said it would be "COOL." i printed it out and its somewhere. huge moment for me.
katie [email] said at 3:25 PM 10-25-2007: OK, how's this for lame:
RIGHT when Kid A came out, like that October, before they went back to Europe and then came over here and did all those shows in North America, Radiohead had three concerts this side of the pond to showcase Kid A. NYC, Toronto, and Los Angeles. I got in my car, and I drove to North Carolina and picked up another fan I met on the internet. We met some more rhmsgbd fans in NYC and stalked rh's hotel. We went to the Madison Square Garden show and skulked around Rockefeller Center the night of the SNL taping. Then we heard Thom and Jonny were going to a rally for Ralph Nader the following evening; me and another girl went and skulked that out, too. We actually ran into Thom and Ed walking on the street after the rally with Adam Yauch. And we ran up to them and tried to talk to them. (thom left, he was clearly frightened; Ed and Adam stuck around for a couple of minutes).
Well, after that, I decided I should drive to Toronto. I went to that show, and decided the only thing left to do would be to drive to Los Angeles. So I did. Three days straight through, stopping to sleep for a couple of hours at a time, by myself, in a 1997 Toyota Camry. I made it to LA but the show was sold out so I watched it from Griffith Park with all the other non-ticket-havers. I slept for a day and started home to Louisiana the next. I made it to within about 50 miles of the Texas-New Mexico border on I-10, when I ran my car off the road into a saguaro cactus and a mud pile, breaking my rear axle and totalling the car. I took a Greyhound home, and have been weird about listening to Radiohead ever since. But I still like In Rainbows; it touches me in weird places, to quote Brandon down there.
reggie [email] said at 3:33 PM 10-18-2007: Well Mr. Look at me I'm in Spin and Rolling Stone, hook a brotha up!
Jus' playing. I'm not sure if I could do these for anything but fun. Don't wanna become all jaded and start hating everything that isn't made by some obscure German art-noise group.
katie [email] said at 11:39 AM 10-17-2007: I like it too, Reggie. It's disturbing and personal and makes me see troubling images in my mind. And the production is incredible. I can't wait to hear what it sounds like on vinyl.
brandon [email] said at 6:09 PM 10-19-2007: I haven't listened to them in ages. Kid-A is one of my favorite albums of a certain type from forever, but I haven't listened to anything by them since. I used to dress like Johnny Greenwoodin H.S., and I had Pablo Honey on all the time. The Bends came out in what 1994/1995? And it was so stand-out. Here's a sophomore album that blew away the first one in song-writing, in production, whatever. Pablo Honey sounds generic in places. The Bends, not at all, it was rock-and-roll, in the middle of shlock bar-bands and ersatz brit-pop. Then OK Computer came out, and I wasn't an instant fan. To me, It's not that it's ground-breaking. It's not Dylan going electric, it's just a huge gambit for a band positioned like they were to radiaclly tweak their sound so much. Despite all the creative control that Thom Yorke has, Greenwood said in this interview, probably around 1993, and probably in some guitar mag, about how it was becoming perhaps more important to learn how to play your amplifier than it was your guitar, which kind of makes a neat benchmark for the band's ethos what they did later, radical tweaking of a more or less rock-and-roll base. After Kid-A though, I thought, this is it. They're finished creatively. I do recall having listened to a track or two from Hail to the Thief and a couple of subsequent albums, which confirmed my suspicions. I haven't listened to In Rainbows. I believe very strongly that most bands have a shelf-life before they become at best repetitious at worst just bad. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. But, I don't think that we need to extend loyalty to a sound beyond that, labeling things innovative that are merely workmanlike for the sake of nostalgia.
But who knows, maybe I'll listen to this and it'll touch me in naughty places.