"If anyone can do elf fashion well, I can!" - Daisy A. Lacey
 

ADVERTISMENTS:





call us:
206-350-1082

support killoggs!
  Wed

mary
The Company

Ben ... Edward Furlong
Brad ... Edward Norton
Katie ... Anna Paquin
Mary ... Claire Danes
Josh ... Seth Green
Milky ... Dennis Hopper
Brandon ... Ashton Kutcher
Dianne ... Dolly Parton, in a brunette wig
Sonny ... Randy Quaid
Rick ... Jude Law
Bibbly ... Ryan Phillipe
Arnie ... Phillip Seymour Hoffman
Carla ... Maggie Gyllenhaal.
Kara ... Christina Ricci
Craig ... Alan Cumming
Wil ... Jeff Sheldon
Jeff ... Wil Wheaton
XMX ... Parker Posey
Amy ... Julia Roberts
Buzz ... Gary Busy
Courtney ... Lucy Liu
Cricket ... Drew Barrymore


*started by shell

[ 216 responses ] < Post > < link >
[ posted by mary at 02/18/2004 01:43:24 AM ]
[ trackback ]



Threaded Responses [ bottom ]
courtney [email] said at 2:05 AM 02-18-2004:
lucy liu? hmm. I'm not as sexy as she.

I've been compared more the Janeane Garofalo.

Are we talking more about looks or personalities, anyways?
craig [email] said at 2:07 AM 02-18-2004:
Kiche ... Henry Winkler
neilbert said at 4:12 AM 02-18-2004:
Fuck no, Teddy a.k.a. "Kiche" IS fucking Mark Ruffalo of "In the cut," and "You can count on me," fame.

Check it out!
http://www.imdb.com/gallery/granitz/2296/Events/2296/DSC1808JPG_Fred_2063289_400.jpg?path=pgallery&path_key=Ruffalo,%20Mark
[Reply To this] [#95876] [ip: logged]
David Robertson said at 8:54 AM 02-18-2004:
Mary = Juliette Lewis
[Reply To this] [#95878] [ip: logged]
    anotherben.. said at 9:07 AM 02-18-2004:
    allyson hannigan.
    [Reply To this] [#95880] [ip: logged]
    mary [email] said at 12:45 PM 02-18-2004:
    Dave Robertson ... Ryan Phillipe.

    Bibbly now played by Hayden Christenson.
      brandon [email] said at 2:42 PM 02-18-2004:
      This is not cool with either me nor the Bibbly. Christenson lost any and all attractiveness (sort of like Leo Dicaprio)following AOTC. Select a more suitable doppelganger for my deity.
        mary [email] said at 3:03 PM 02-18-2004:
        a pox on you. hayden is dreamy.
          josh [email] said at 3:07 PM 02-18-2004:
          In your eyes, simply because he played Stephen Glass.
            mary [email] said at 3:09 PM 02-18-2004:
            Nope, I liked him as AOTC, too. Now that's devotion.

            He looks a good bit like James, I think.
              rick [email] said at 3:13 PM 02-18-2004:
              AOTC?

              He does look a bit like James.

                mary [email] said at 3:15 PM 02-18-2004:
                IN AOTC. sorry.

                but what are you doing correcting my typos/grammer, you little robot gigilo?!
                  rick [email] said at 3:17 PM 02-18-2004:
                  Well, I would mock you over having liked at least one part of that bad film but I just remembered that Ms. Portman looked rather fetching in it.

                  It was still a bad film though not as bad as the previous installment.

                    rick [email] said at 3:18 PM 02-18-2004:
                    What a minute! Mr. Christiansen sports a rattail in that film! You are showing a side of yourself I was not aware of.
                  josh [email] said at 3:20 PM 02-18-2004:
                  you misspelled gigolo.
          Michael said at 4:43 PM 02-18-2004:
          hayden sucks. did you see 'life as a house' or whatever it was called? i thought he was awful. i don't think he can act at all.
          [Reply To this] [#96087] [ip: logged]
            mary [email] said at 4:46 PM 02-18-2004:
            What does his skill at *acting* have to do with anything?

            Next you'll be trying to tell me that the reason I think you're a hottie is because of your marketing skills.
            rick [email] said at 6:37 PM 02-18-2004:
            I saw it. It was a dull film with many cliches. The finished house did look nice though.
            linus [email] said at 7:02 AM 02-19-2004:
            I dunno...he broods and whines pretty well. I bet he'd play a mean retard.
      Woody said at 3:37 PM 02-18-2004:
      Haha, Mary likes a Canadian...
      [Reply To this] [#96043] [ip: logged]
        MsMary said at 3:44 PM 02-18-2004:
        Oh, I like all sorts of Canadians. Like Gen, for one.
        [Reply To this] [#96046] [ip: logged]
        rick [email] said at 3:44 PM 02-18-2004:
        She likes lots of Canadians and things particular to Canada. Just ask her if the U.S. has universal health coverage.
          MsMary said at 3:47 PM 02-18-2004:
          I would offer to lick maple syrup off of Hayden, but i think he's from vancouver.
          [Reply To this] [#96050] [ip: logged]
            rick [email] said at 3:53 PM 02-18-2004:
            That is an amusing image. And Vancouver is in Canada though there is also one in Washington state.
              mary [email] said at 4:39 PM 02-18-2004:
              Right. But Vancouver is the hemp part of Canada, as opposed to the maple syrup part.

              I could, of course, lose the syrup, and just invite him to play a game of tongue hockey.
      brianbibbly [email] said at 10:17 AM 02-19-2004:
      I object to being Hayden Whatever-his-name-is. Please convert me back to Ryan Whatever-his-name-is.
      courtney [email] said at 10:29 PM 02-19-2004:
      "From the moment I met you, all those years ago, a day hasn't gone by when I haven't thought of you. And now that I'm with you again, I'm in agony. The closer I get to you, the worse it gets. The thought of not being with you makes me dizzy! I can't breathe! I'm haunted by the kiss you never should have given me. My heart is beating, hoping that kiss will not become a scar." -Anakin Skywalker

      *GAG*
milky [email] said at 9:10 AM 02-18-2004:
How inna heck you get Hopper, Mary? I figured I'd score Walken if it were the creep factor.
    Baby Duck said at 9:18 AM 02-18-2004:
    Nicolas Cage as Milky, cmon now! Or a Johnny Suede Brad Pitt
    [Reply To this] [#95882] [ip: logged]
      Milk said at 10:46 AM 02-18-2004:
      I'll settle for C. Thomas Howell. Heck, if you want to be creative, Anthony Anderson.
      [Reply To this] [#95917] [ip: logged]
        Shell said at 1:31 PM 02-18-2004:
        Okay, C. Thomas Howell. Not Eminem, though ;).
        [Reply To this] [#95976] [ip: logged]
    josh [email] said at 12:27 PM 02-18-2004:
    Maybe a young walken.
    mary [email] said at 12:31 PM 02-18-2004:
    Ask Ben, that was his idea.
Baby Duck said at 9:23 AM 02-18-2004:
Brandon: Josh Hartnett
[Reply To this] [#95883] [ip: logged]
Shell said at 9:25 AM 02-18-2004:
No, no, no--you, Bibbly, Jeff, and Rick started this :). I just like to play the game.


  • Carol Burnett as Ben.
  • Billy Crudup is Josh.
  • Kevin Smith as Ed.
  • D.B. Sweeney as Sonny.
  • Ethan Embry as Anotherben.
  • Christopher Gorham as Jeff S.
  • Steve Zahn as Jeff G.?
  • Famke Jannsen as Emily.
  • Henry Thomas as Scott.
  • Kate Beckinsale as Meredith.
  • Liev Schreiber as Neal.
  • Jason Schwartzman as Andrew.
  • Maybe Majandra Delfino as Carla.
  • Carly Pope as Pokey.
  • Eddie Kay Thomas as Milky.
  • Thora Birch as Amanda.
  • Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen as Linus


Cameos by:

  • Scarlett Johansson as a wandering woman who haunts many of the male leads.
  • Ewan McGregor as Amy's hubby.
  • Hugh Jackman.
[Reply To this] [#95884] [ip: logged]
    Milk said at 10:57 AM 02-18-2004:
    Eddie Kay Thomas will always play Joseph and only Joseph. I think the votes would be unanimous. Too uncanny...
    [Reply To this] [#95919] [ip: logged]
      brandon [email] said at 11:24 AM 02-18-2004:
      Thomas Lennon could understudy. I don't mean to be crass, but I find Thomas Lennon to be very fuckable
    amanda [email] said at 12:48 PM 02-18-2004:
    I'll take Thora Birch, I suppose. I really can't think of anyone that bares a resemblence to myself. I've had other people tell me I look like her in "Ghost World."

    I still think Ben should be played by David Bowie, and that David Bowie should keep the British accent but say Ben stuff: "Oooh, I dun't know about thaht Fahhppy. Ee's a sad bahhhstad."
    amy [email] said at 10:56 PM 02-21-2004:
    Ewan McGregor is my hubby!
kara [email] said at 9:48 AM 02-18-2004:
Christina Ricci needs to eat a pie.

I want Sherilyn Fenn.
brandon [email] said at 9:58 AM 02-18-2004:
I will take the Virgin Suicides Josh Hartnett over Ashton.
    Baby Duck said at 10:40 AM 02-18-2004:
    Aye, aye, Tripp Fontaine. Now go get more girlies to write your name on their underwear.
    [Reply To this] [#95916] [ip: logged]
craig [email] said at 10:01 AM 02-18-2004:
Who is Katie, the one that resembles anna Paquin?
    katie said at 7:44 PM 02-18-2004:
    it's me. i don't know what anna paquin looks like past that movie about the geese that fly away, or 'the piano', but i'm pretty sure i don't look like her.

    anyway i told mary i shouldn't be included in this post since most of you have met me only once or never and since i'm not a member. but she stuck me in there anyway because when she posted this post i happened to be cooking orange roughy for her. go fig.
    [Reply To this] [#96110] [ip: logged]
      rick [email] said at 10:51 PM 02-18-2004:
      Orange roughy is a healthy fish to eat. :p

      Ms. Paquin is also in "Almost Famous" and "X-Men."

rick [email] said at 10:12 AM 02-18-2004:
Pokey could play Laura.
ed [email] said at 10:13 AM 02-18-2004:
I could live with Kevin Smith. I was trying to figure out who would play me, and couldn't come up with anyone. But I find that choice acceptable. Brown hair, beard, overweight but not huge... Yeah, I can definitely live with that.
    rick [email] said at 10:14 AM 02-18-2004:
    I guess as long as it is not the sidekick from "Home Improvement."

    Or Travis Tritt.

      ed [email] said at 10:37 AM 02-18-2004:
      Actually, Al (from Home Improvement) wouldn't bother me. I think he's hilarious. Not as cool as Kevin Smith, but then again, neither am I.

      Travis Tritt? He's got a goatee. I could never allow a goatee-wearer to play me. It either has to be the full-on Grizzly Adams (like I used to wear) or the thin "fake jawline" like I currently have.
    craig [email] said at 10:19 AM 02-18-2004:
    Billy Ray Cyrus
      ed [email] said at 10:32 AM 02-18-2004:
      I haven't had a mullet for *years*.
        brandonr said at 10:58 AM 02-18-2004:
        I think skinny Ed needs an updated, corresponding celebrity:

        May I submit, Rod McKuen
        [Reply To this] [#95920] [ip: logged]
        craig [email] said at 11:03 AM 02-18-2004:
        Billy Ray is awesome, though.

        I loved his performance in Mulholland Drive.
          rick [email] said at 11:52 AM 02-18-2004:
          Billy Ray Cyrus was, without a doubt, the best part of "Mulholland Drive."
            josh [email] said at 12:27 PM 02-18-2004:
            Obviously you missed all the sapphic love scenes.
              rick [email] said at 1:00 PM 02-18-2004:
              Ah ha! So you admit that "Mulholland Drive" is an overhyped film.
                josh [email] said at 2:34 PM 02-18-2004:
                Huh? I never denied that it was. All David Lynch films are over-hyped... But most of them are good regardless of the hype. Mulholland Drive was a very enjoyable film to watch, but it's no Blue Velvet.
                  ed [email] said at 2:38 PM 02-18-2004:
                  Nothing is Blue Velvet.
                  rick [email] said at 3:06 PM 02-18-2004:
                  "Mulholland Drive" was a mindblowingly boring film. Thank Goodness, the doughty Billy Ray Cyrus showed up to keep it at least somewhat enjoyable. I do not get why people think he and Mr. Altman are such great directors.
                    josh [email] said at 3:18 PM 02-18-2004:
                    Mulholland Drive kept me entertained the whole way through, on the first viewing, at least. In engages your imagination, and it's enjoyable trying to piece together all the little connections. Plus there is a good bit of humor, creepiness, and eye candy.

                    I think the problem is you are too mired in logic, Rick. You don't like fiction, you don't think you should do anything that doesn't make you "stronger"... Etc.

                    Lynch makes films that are unabashedly dreamlike and are pretty much as close to the term "art film" you can get and still have it be a film. I can't imagine you appreciating that too much, based on your other preferences...
                      rick [email] said at 3:20 PM 02-18-2004:
                      Please! How could I like "Gummo" if I had to have a logical film? Or for that matter, "Crash" which came out the same summer?
                        josh [email] said at 3:23 PM 02-18-2004:
                        You like Gummo because it has the same sort of "aw shucks! dumb white folks" humor that makes you consider Billy Ray Cyrus the only good aspect of MD.

                        Crash isn't anywhere close to as dreamlike of a film as MD... It follows a very solid, simple progression of story. And it is chock full of nudity and sex, other things which appeal to all.
                          rick [email] said at 3:25 PM 02-18-2004:
                          "You like Gummo because it has the same sort of "aw shucks! dumb white folks" humor that makes you consider Billy Ray Cyrus the only good aspect of MD."

                          Yeah, all the crass and horrendous vignettes that go through "Gummo" are great little bits of poor white humor.


                          "And it is chock full of nudity and sex, other things which appeal to all."

                          You mean like that oh-so-sexy scene of wound penetration?

                            josh [email] said at 3:32 PM 02-18-2004:
                            You deny that Gummo (a film I love) is mostly comprised of scenes that are poking fun at trashy types? I think I could probably name 20 scenes of the top of my head that poke fun of people who are not upperclass artistes like Mr Corine. Again, I like the film, but it is a delightful exercise in mockery.

                            You deny that Crash is a film about sex and car crashes? Because when Cronenberg (Or Ballard) is asked about what the film or book is about, that is their response : "sex and car crashes". What's NOT to like about that?
                              rick [email] said at 3:36 PM 02-18-2004:
                              "You deny that Gummo (a film I love) is mostly comprised of scenes that are poking fun at trashy types?"

                              It definitely is but to me, white trash humor is more like "Hee-Haw" or something. "Gummo" is just sort of reflective of a general regional bias that one sees all the time in Hollywood.

                              "You deny that Crash is a film about sex and car crashes?"

                              No, I just do not find it erotic. And yes, there are normal sex scenes in the film.

                                josh [email] said at 3:47 PM 02-18-2004:
                                Well, that's what I meant by poking fun at trashy types. I mean the film is poking fun AT them, not laughing WITH them, like with "Hee-Haw".

                                My dad is from a farming community of ~400 people. He loved Hee-Haw. I doubt he would find Gummo amusing.
                                  rick [email] said at 3:54 PM 02-18-2004:
                                  Fine but I think that to be snobby humor, not white trash humor.
                                    josh [email] said at 4:05 PM 02-18-2004:
                                    That's fine, since YOU introduced the term "white trash humor" into the debate, did you not?

                                    As I recall, I called it "aw shucks! dumb white folks" humor and "poking fun at trashy types".

                                    Why do you insist on creating arguments where there are none?
                                      rick [email] said at 4:08 PM 02-18-2004:
                                      ""aw shucks! dumb white folks" humor"

                                      Josh, e-mail me if you meet anyone in Corine's crowd who says "Aw shucks!" Or anyone living in any comunity with a population of 500,000 +. That is likely what made me suspicious.

                                        josh [email] said at 4:14 PM 02-18-2004:
                                        Obviously it was meant in a mocking tone, Ricky. I wasn't detailing what I felt Corine said at the moment he conceived of the film.

                                        Again, you take things very literally, as I pointed out elsewhere in this thread. Perhaps this is part of why you didn't appreciate Mulholland Drive.
                                          rick [email] said at 4:16 PM 02-18-2004:
                                          Literal does not equal logical.
                                            josh [email] said at 4:24 PM 02-18-2004:
                                            No, but my comment still stands.
                                              rick [email] said at 7:41 PM 02-18-2004:
                                              "I don't believe you can resist/ the thing that makes no sense."

                                              "I don't believe reality would be/ the way it should/ but I believe in fantasy/ future's understood."

                                              -from "Believe" sung by Frau Franke Potente from the soundtrack to "Lola rennt" ( "Run, Lola, Run")

                                  pokey [email] said at 9:11 PM 02-18-2004:
                                  Gummo is one of my favourite films. It reminds me of growing up on the edges of Eugene, in Oregon. I watch it with nostalgic affection, and a little sadness, but I have never viewed it as mocking, or the chatacters as characatures.
                                    josh [email] said at 9:30 PM 02-18-2004:
                                    I find it hard to believe that Harmony Korine didn't mean for it to be mocking...
                                      pokey [email] said at 7:57 AM 02-20-2004:
                                      I don't know what he intended. Do you think he intended Julien Donkey Boy to be mocking, too?
                                    angie p. said at 1:48 PM 02-20-2004:
                                    Whenever someone tells me I look like Chloe whatever her name is, I always picture her in Gummo (all scary and gross with tape on her nipples) and I think that's their impression of me and I want to stomp my feet and cry. But reguardless, I too, thought it was a really well made film, mocking or not.
                                    [Reply To this] [#96350] [ip: logged]
                        josh [email] said at 3:23 PM 02-18-2004:
                        That said, I also enjoy both Gummo and Crash.
                      rick [email] said at 3:22 PM 02-18-2004:
                      I know other people who think it is boring as well. It was just one slow scene after another. In fact, I doubt that Mr. Cyrus' output would have been entertaining in another film but it was such a departure from that film, that it seem fresh and free-spirited.
                        josh [email] said at 3:27 PM 02-18-2004:
                        There are some slow scenes, but many great ones... The hit man who has to keep killing people, meeting the cowboy, the creepy guy behind the coffee shop, the drag queen singing, the two audition scenes, the "this coffee is shit"/"shes the girl" scene... And the last 20 minutes is very exciting, has some of the most intense moments of any film I can recall, and redefines the first 90% of the film. All in all, a better and more interesting film than most directors make in their careers, and it's only Lynch's third-or-fourth-best (in my view).
                          rick [email] said at 3:30 PM 02-18-2004:
                          "And the last 20 minutes is very exciting, has some of the most intense moments of any film I can recall, and redefines the first 90% of the film."

                          The last twenty minutes were a bit better paced.

                          "All in all, a better and more interesting film than most directors make in their careers, and it's only Lynch's third-or-fourth-best (in my view)."

                          That might be true but once again, over 99% of the output in any creative genre in any year is forgettable. I do not care that people like the film but saying it SO much better than the dreck that is playing at cinemas right now is just goofy.

                            josh [email] said at 3:35 PM 02-18-2004:
                            Why is it goofy? You said you don't understand why people like Lynch. I stated that this is not even one of his best films, yet I think it's a better film than most directors will ever make. It's simply a bold statement repudating your claim.
                              rick [email] said at 3:39 PM 02-18-2004:
                              Alright, I have seen three Lynch films:

                              "Lost Highway" which was awful.

                              "The Straight Story" which was decent.

                              "Mulholland Drive" which was very slow and boring.

                              I have seen "The Elephant Man" but I cannot really remember what it was like as it was so long ago so I am not going to talk about it. But two of those three films were just bad. One very much so and the other was really boring.

                                josh [email] said at 3:50 PM 02-18-2004:
                                And I would not rank any of those among his top 3 films.

                                And you think that the Straight Story is more quick-paced than Mulholland Drive? That's amazing.

                                For the record, I would say his best 3 films would be:

                                Blue Velvet
                                Eraserhead
                                the Elephant Man

                                Lost Highway was terrible. I would rank it near the bottom, just above Fire Walk With Me.
                                  rick [email] said at 3:51 PM 02-18-2004:
                                  "The Straight Story" was a very pretty film. It may have something to do with the fact it was filmed in Iowa.
                                ed [email] said at 4:43 PM 02-18-2004:
                                Blue Velvet. Wild At Heart. Eraserhead.

                                You saw movies after Lynch became some mythical figure. The three I named are what *made* him a mythical figure. Okay, Elephant Man did too, but it's my least favorite DL movie.
                                  art said at 4:58 PM 02-18-2004:
                                  I'm with you, Ed. I saw those movies when they first came out, nobody heard of Lynch back then. I talked six friends into going to see Eraserhead in college. Four of them walked out of it in the first half-hour. The two that stuck around never let me forget that I 'forced' them to see that 'hideous' movie. As for me, I liked it, although it is a hard movie to genuinely like.
                                  [Reply To this] [#96091] [ip: logged]
                      rick [email] said at 3:23 PM 02-18-2004:
                      I like eye-candy as much as the next red-blooded, American dood but it will not, by itself, save a film.
                        josh [email] said at 3:24 PM 02-18-2004:
                        I mean eye candy as in good cinematography, not nekkid chicks... Though the film has both...
                          rick [email] said at 3:26 PM 02-18-2004:
                          "I mean eye candy as in good cinematography"

                          To me, that describes more a film like "The Thin Red Line" ( which is so much better than masturbatory muck like "Mulholland Drive.")

                            josh [email] said at 3:37 PM 02-18-2004:
                            Now THERE is a boring, slow paced film... I like it okay, but it is much slower-paced than MD. Though it does have better cinematography thoughout most of it... But there were no shots in ATRL that made me go "I've never seen a shot like that before", unlike MD.
                              rick [email] said at 3:43 PM 02-18-2004:
                              It is a slow film but it is a much more better film. And as you said, it does have better cinematography, even if it does not push any new boundaries.

                              But cinematography of a film, like acting, plot, special effects and "eye candy," cannot by itself save a film. And the easiest way a film will fail by me is to bore me. The fact that "The Thin Red Line" held my interest despite it being very, very slow, earns it a lot of brownie points by me.

                                josh [email] said at 3:57 PM 02-18-2004:
                                I don't really see why it held _your_ interest beyond your simply being interested in the HISTORICAL subject matter more... Why would you say it was "much more better"?
                                  rick [email] said at 4:03 PM 02-18-2004:
                                  Really? The film is not historical beyond the fact that there were battles fought in the South Pacific against the Japanese. With any film, I like to see how characters react to things and "The Thin Red Line" allows one to see in spades. Also, it was pretty and it broke up its flow every now and then. Moreover, it had a lot of good actors ( and I mean Mssrs. Chaplin, Caviezel and the like, not all the cameos). It had a lot of little stories within the bigger one. And it had dreamlike sequences as well though it would not be as dreamlike as "Mulholland Drive."
                                    josh [email] said at 4:15 PM 02-18-2004:
                                    Yes but it is rooted in a historical setting, and someone who likes history might well enjoying watching and observing the accuracy of uniforms, weaponry, tactics, etc.
                                      rick [email] said at 4:18 PM 02-18-2004:
                                      I did not go into the film to see a cinematic presentation of history. It is based on a novel. And history, yes, but I am not interested in every bit of history. I think I am about the only person who majored in history at LSU who never took the Civil War or WWII courses offered there.

                                      I think the film is more philosophical, than historical.

                      rick [email] said at 3:34 PM 02-18-2004:
                      "Lynch makes films that are unabashedly dreamlike and