ADVERTISMENTS:
call us:
206-350-1082
support killoggs!
|
 |
| |  |
 |
|
 |
|
Threaded Responses [ bottom ]
 | josh [email] said at 1:49 PM 08-28-2003:
Majority (of heads) rules, and I will be the tie-breaker.
You must be logged in to vote. |
 | andy [email] said at 5:18 PM 08-28-2003:
Josh, he totally made fun of you for not being able to block him the first time. I know you aren't gonna stand for that. |
Non-head said at 1:54 PM 08-28-2003:
Wade that knew about the worm? In what post did he err...? |
Woody said at 4:37 PM 08-28-2003:
Yeah, yeah, let's have some links! |
|
| josh [email] said at 4:43 PM 08-28-2003:
You guys don't get to vote so why should I bother? |
Woody said at 1:31 AM 08-29-2003:
Fine. Be that way, tank-top face! |
 | rick [email] said at 4:59 PM 10-10-2003:
I just noticed that epithet. I love it! |
 | milky [email] said at 2:05 PM 08-28-2003:
Nah. FUCK him. Hell NO.
And tell anotherben not bring his friends around here to speak for him and stink the place up.
Suede Coward, working his charms. Funny. |
|
| josh [email] said at 3:58 PM 08-28-2003:
Wade says, via email:
"all that is fine jeff, the first and last part anyway, and if it wasnt i couldnt really respond to it bec that would be tantamount to campaigning within 50 ft of a voting place it seems, something we frown upon even in louisiana.
however, i must point out that ben didnt bring me here, i have known about the site for at least two years, and in fact it was someone else who turned me onto it back then. further, i would say ben would probably vote "no" since he called me last night and said quote "watch out, some of that stuff is uncalled for and a bit much". so... i hope that quells this path. ben has always ben a great guy.
thanks jeff." |
|
| milky [email] said at 4:06 PM 08-28-2003:
i e-mailed him before his torrents. he has my e-mail address. he can address me directly, if he chooses to. |
|
| josh [email] said at 4:13 PM 08-28-2003:
W O R D! |
 | anotherben [email] said at 8:00 PM 08-28-2003:
heh. you stupid pathetic jackass, let's set a few things straight. 1. my friends don't speak for me, and i have not and will not ever bring anyone around to do so. 2. yes, wade is my friend. that in no way makes me responsible for what he does or says. some of us in the world have free will, and come up with our own thoughts (complete ones at that). 3. your regular little insults that you direct at me then brush aside under the rug of "we are friends, it's ok.. killoggs isnt real" are getting old. i have no need or desire to prove myself to you, or to sway your political vagueries.. so, often your trite character attacks go completely ignored. my policy has changed. you want a kinder gentler killoggs?... stop responding to my responses with empty insults and back up your response with something more than simply trying to imply i am a stupid republican mimeograph. otherwise, i will use bigger words to call you stupid. childish?, yes.. but it will have the desired effect.
with that said, i would like to vote "yes". killoggs has taken offense in the past from headless writers, why are wade's offenses dealt with in this manner, while we had to endure the long drawn out froth and bile of one mean mean monkey? his language is no more "colorful" than some of brandons more inspired writings. his attacks are not more personal than many of the volleys that have been loosed here before. we are a clever bunch, i am sure there is another way to deal with such times that does not involve censorship. a "no" vote is cowardice. this is (as of now) a public site. people you don't like are going to come along. people josh has certainly not liked have come along before... they were not blocked. if someone had showed up and aimed their cannons at me i would not ask for or expect to be protected from them. that is all i have to say. |
|
| milky [email] said at 9:43 PM 08-28-2003:
shit, I'm impressed. Took you all evening, too. |
|
| anotherben [email] said at 9:46 PM 08-28-2003:
haha. you fucking simpleton. some of us have jobs. |
|
| milky [email] said at 9:50 PM 08-28-2003:
OK, Benny, you wanna start calling the dogs, bring it on. You can t-t-t-type this shit, but you'd never h-h-have the buh-bah-balls to say it to my face. You oughtta think about that. |
|
| milky [email] said at 9:59 PM 08-28-2003:
As far as simpleton goes:
a) I didn't lose a scholarship in one semester. Teach me how one day.
b) You've been chasing the same girl who doesn't want you for years. Ali doesn't like you like that.
c)You honestly believe unrelated events propogated by the current administration are _actually_ related. I'll give you somne paper and crayons. Maybe you can draw me a picture, retard.
d) I don't call Hispanics "swimmers" or "breeders," so go unfuck yourself, you pathetic piece of orange shit.
e) You're a social mongoloid. You actually thought Amy Ashford would want to _date_ your E.T. looking ass? God, son, you are dense
f) Fuck off and come back when you have some ammo. I'll reset your nose and give you a Barney to the head, LSMSA-stylee. |
|
| milky [email] said at 10:09 PM 08-28-2003:
C'mon, step to the mic, Choke. |
|
| milky [email] said at 10:18 PM 08-28-2003:
Choke.
Choke.
Choke.
Choke.
Choke.
Choke.
Choke.
Choke. |
|
| milky [email] said at 10:20 PM 08-28-2003:
Why don't you just scream over your sandwich and run home, pussy? |
|
| milky [email] said at 10:26 PM 08-28-2003:
The winner speaks:
Milky Milkerton: c'mon, just work with what ya got.
Milky Milkerton: lol
Milky Milkerton: hahahahahahaha
ben: im on the phone you sad sad person.
Milky Milkerton: don't bother
*** ______ben@hotmail.com signed off at Thu Aug 28 22:23:36 2003
Guess he's bringing in a ghost writer. |
|
| anotherben [email] said at 10:47 PM 08-28-2003:
wow.. you have some serious issues. how many people have you been in little pissing matches with on killoggs? i can think of 4 or 5 right off the bat. maybe it is time for a little introspection. |
|
| anotherben [email] said at 10:42 PM 08-28-2003:
sorry jeff, i had to go to the bathroom, you will have to forgive my non-constant vigilance for more opportunities to mock you. ah.. lets see..
a)it is very easy, but you probably couldnt even get that right.
b)?.
c)more of your random jibberish.
d)me either. we do have something in common after all.
e) i asked amy out once. i dont think i was the first fellow to be rejected by her. she was pretty cute. on the subject of rejection.. want to talk about jena?
f)i dont enjoy this sort of thing, but new policy dictates i cannot allow you to think you have had any sort of victory.. so.. whenever you are ready to stop.. |
|
| milky [email] said at 10:49 PM 08-28-2003:
You're forgetting that I actually dated Jena. We broke up when I was 17 after dating for a whole week.
And you HAVE made those racist statements, so don't front ben, you're exposed, you know it. And it wasn't funny-ha ha when you said it, although I know you had that shit-eating grin on your mug. You wanna explain that to Demond, Zack or my fiancee? Lie some more. You make my stomach turn. |
|
| anotherben [email] said at 10:55 PM 08-28-2003:
ok, honestly, i am not concerned about your relationships.. tho it seems you have been keeping somewhat innacurate tabs on mine. and, i have not made "those racist statements". but if you insist that i have, please back up your statements with some proof. or should i just start talking about how you like to look at pictures of little naked boys? there was the time on killoggs where i referred to palestinians as having a "swarm" mentality. you ever stirred up a wasp nest white boy? |
|
| milky [email] said at 11:30 PM 08-28-2003:
nice try.
Get some orange plaid bedsheets and start making yourself a hood and robe. |
|
| milky [email] said at 12:38 AM 08-29-2003:
josh, if you want to hear the backing on those statements, e-mail me. I'm not going to publicly drag anyone down to anotherben's level. but there are some other peculiarities on killoggs i can explain without hesitation or accusations that are unfounded. |
|
| josh [email] said at 9:29 AM 08-29-2003:
I think you guys should probably be discussing this in private, honestly. Obviously you have some issues with Ben and vice versa and it'd probably be better for everyone if you guys dealt with that between yourselves... |
|
| milky [email] said at 11:16 AM 08-29-2003:
yeah. i got my ya-ya's out. i feel like crap, but i just speak my mind and i just speak the truth. |
|
| milky [email] said at 11:38 PM 08-28-2003:
you ever stirred up a wasp nest white boy?
This, soming from someone so white, he's nearly albino. Look, stop posturing like Reagan or Dubya. I can put you out with one fist and you know it. All the screaming like a pussy won't stop the fact that when the fist actually connects with that orange, freckled glob that serves as a visge, you'll be through.
Wait, you're through already. |
|
| anotherben [email] said at 11:44 PM 08-28-2003:
jeez jeff, it seems you are about to have a stroke. shouldnt you turn all that rage toward something positive, like getting a JOB? oh.. and stop threatening me. |
|
| milky [email] said at 12:40 AM 08-29-2003:
It's not rage. It's watching you squirm for the shit you've said to me and other people. It explains why you have the beliefs that you do, why you're such a stooge, why you vote the way you do. You couldn't take it up North because, well, you're just a Good Ole' Boy. You think you mean no harm, but you harm anyway...because you can't think for yourself. |
|
| anotherben [email] said at 11:53 PM 08-28-2003:
am i albino?
. or am i orange and freckled?
make up your mind
. monkey. |
|
| milky [email] said at 12:33 AM 08-29-2003:
Forget about it, toad. I'm in an economy you _helped_ depress. |
AnotherGeoff said at 12:44 AM 08-29-2003:
Jesus Christ. Honestly, I don't mean to butt in but can you two please just make up and give each other a hug? I respect the hell out of you two.
This may not be my website nor my place but I wish you two would stop. If anything to preserve a friendship. |
 | brandon [email] said at 1:04 AM 08-29-2003:
It's sort of like when Cassady and Jesse are beating the shit out of one another outside the Alamo.
Just your last statement made me think of that.
I've anyone has a taxidermied sawfish, I'm game to play Herr Starr. |
Shell said at 12:54 AM 08-29-2003:
Why? Why would you attack Ben like this when he was just clarifying his position and asking questions? Granted the two of you have history, but this kind of thing (while ironic in a post about blocking an individual for malicious responses) is thoughtless at best and careless of Ben's feelings at worst.
Not that you're any better, Ben, responding in kind. Geez, guys. Oh. Guys. Is this a guy thing? |
anotherben.. said at 1:12 AM 08-29-2003:
sorry shell, and anothergeoff. i just got tired of smiling off the potshots. i dont even really know this guy. we knew some of the same people back when. when i moved to ny, he added me to his postcard list. so i occasionally sent a postcard back, tho, i am a terribly lazy snailmailer. i have always been cordial to him (except for the snippy responses to his insult comments) until today when he decided to start insulting my friends too.. and, well, it has been a long day. apologies to any i may have unintentionally offended. |
 | ed [email] said at 2:05 AM 08-29-2003:
If it's a guy thing, I must not be a guy.
I have no idea what precipitated this, as I have been extra-busy since my recent sobriety has actually allowed me to start living my life again, but I think it's a shame that things have apparently come to this.
My mom taught me to either make nice, or if that was not possible, to ignore whatever was causing the problem. I don't always succeed, but it sounds like some people here (and I am most certainly not naming names or choosing sides) need to give that a try. |
Shell said at 1:11 AM 08-29-2003:
why are wade's offenses dealt with in this manner, while we had to endure the long drawn out froth and bile of one mean mean monkey?
As animals, we have the ability to adapt to our environment. As human beings, we have the ability to change it. We learn from past experiences. Once burned twice shy. Mean mean monkey taught Josh, taught all of us, a lesson: let things go on too long ,or go too far, and the result is that individuals censor themselves.
Such is the chilling effect Killoggs will experience if such pernicious attacks are allowed to continue. I think we both know that some people are still reluctant to post after what happened with MMMonkey. Can we blame them for being wary?
Josh has seen the results of cruelty here and he’s simply taking action sooner this time, imo.
his language is no more "colorful" than some of brandons more inspired writings.
It's not language, it's intent. Does anyone take Brandon’s vulgarity seriously? How could we? It’s clear even to overly serious, literal-minded, Puritanical little me that Brandon’s invective is for shock value. When not stringing together paragraphs filled with anatomical crudities, he writes with power and clarity. I don't *think* he launches unprovoked attacks (or maybe he did on drugs. Wasn't here, don't claim to know).
his attacks are not more personal than many of the volleys that have been loosed here before.
Weren't they? Even if they weren't, how are we to distinguish that? with the other volleys, it’s a matter of credibility born of familiarity. We don’t _know_ Wade. When Brandon offers his tube sock and tennis balls, we ignore it (or, I suppose, we laugh, depending upon our personalities). When Cricket writes cruel things about Bibbly, we ignore it (or laugh). Even when Bradley threatens Brandon, we ignore it. (Isn’t it Killoggs law we must ignore Bradley?) Probably everyone but me ignores the Milky, Kiche, Anotherben, Craig stuff, too. The thing is, everyone mentioned has a history, on Killoggs, if not together. And as disgusting as Bradley’s been, he’s never personally attacked an individual in the way MMMonkey did, or Wade did.
i am sure there is another way to deal with such times that does not involve censorship
Although it’s tempting to offer a crash course in constitutional law as it applies to censorship, in this case censorship is a red herring. The real issues are social responsibility and values. Perhaps Wade misread some things and formed an opinion that courtesy and respect are absent in this community. That’s untrue, although several individuals have an uneasy coexistence.
if someone had showed up and aimed their cannons at me i would not ask for or expect to be protected from them.
You don't have to ask for it; that's part of what being a member of a community is about.
Look, tonight (because Milky's pushing some boundaries) I've jumped into the fray. As I unwisely did between two members earlier this year. In that case, though, sincere apologies were exchanged. We’ve yet to see an apology from Wade for his behaviour. As Andy pointed out, Wade taunted Josh when IP blocking first entered the conversation. If Wade respected the Killoggs community, he’d be willing to abide by the standards of conduct that reign here. They’re pretty loose, after all. Yet, we’ve seen no contrition.
It seems, both from his posts in the “Electrifying Wisdom” thread and his email to Josh, Wade considers this a game. Fine. We don’t want to play, because we don’t play that way. He said he sought the weakest to taunt; that was a mistake because we, none of us, are weak, for we aren’t alone.
Killoggs may be the most dysfunctional family on the ‘net, but it’s ours.
If I didnt' like to type so much, I'd have just referred you to Brandon's response below. No, the other one. But this, you know, mean, unprovoked shit cannot abide |
|
| ed [email] said at 11:47 AM 08-29-2003:
Best. Response. Evar.
This lady needs a head. |
 | shelly [email] said at 2:18 PM 09-03-2003:
Shell got the tone just right. i wish i'd responded to this sooner but i couldn't some up with something nearly this coherent.
killoggs seems to have a bit of an identity problem cause we can't decide if we're a public or private party. the hating has worn me out and i'd prefer not to get caught in the cross fire again. i'd usually prefer to ignore troublemakers for the opportunity of a wider discourse and broader spectrum of opinions. hearing counterpoints from Woody and chancing upon people like Shell have been what has made it worthwhile to endure less fruitful "introductions." |
|
| josh [email] said at 2:28 PM 09-03-2003:
If I ever get time, I'd like to get the preferences working. So people could choose to not view random strangers by default, or perhaps simply not allow non-members to reply to their posts or something.
I'm definitely open to suggestions.
Maybe I should make it so that you have to sign in to respond, but anyone can make a sign in... This wouldn't be the same as a head.
Then there would be accountability, and if you don't like someone, you could just click "ignore". Or something. |
Michael said at 3:07 PM 09-03-2003:
How about this: When lurkers first come to the site, their initial post is held by Josh for review, once its approved that lurker's email address is allowed to post unfettered indefinitely, unless he/she makes an ass of themselves and lose priveleges. If you're worried about people lifting email addresses to post you could either hide the email addy to strangers or just create unique usernames or sign ins for lurkers. This has the unfortunate effect of creating more administration bs for you though. |
|
| josh [email] said at 3:36 PM 09-03-2003:
Way too much work. |
 | mary [email] said at 2:58 PM 08-29-2003:
Great post, Shell. Just one point though: Bradley DID make personal attacks. He's the one who started the "mary is ugly" stuff a while back. And these latter edition trolls were just picking up on his fabulous example.
However, to his credit, he has stopped. |
Shell said at 4:13 PM 08-29-2003:
Mary, I didn't realize that. Thanks for clarifying :). |
bradley said at 4:24 PM 08-29-2003:
Hey, I didn't start that. I just started it on killoggs. I was following the lead of the people that anonymously email you about your picture by your column.
Oh yeah, Ben and Milky RULE!! |
atchafalaya said at 10:22 PM 06-16-2005:
hahahahaha! hehe. hoo. |
|
| josh [email] said at 2:20 PM 08-28-2003:
Things aren't looking good for you, Wade. Maybe there will be an upswell, though, you never know. |
|
| mary [email] said at 2:25 PM 08-28-2003:
I think my vote is an obvious one: No. |
|
| josh [email] said at 2:25 PM 08-28-2003:
Hmm, you know what? I think when I get home from work I will set THIS post up so that wade can respond to this one. That would be interesting, we can get his side. |
 | craig [email] said at 2:26 PM 08-28-2003:
Fuck no. Off with his head... |
 | kevin [email] said at 2:47 PM 08-28-2003:
he has has no killoggs head to cut off. heh. is there killoggs probation? |
|
| mary [email] said at 2:27 PM 08-28-2003:
On second thought, I'll change my vote to a yes, but only if he donates $100 to Planned Parenthood. Now that Martin has shown me the light, I don't accept apologies, only bribes. |
|
| andy [email] said at 5:23 PM 08-28-2003:
I have more money than GOD
:to quote Mr. Wade. I think he can do better than $100. How about $1000? $10,000? WWJD? |
|
| shelly [email] said at 7:28 PM 08-28-2003:
how did Martin show you the light? |
martin said at 9:59 PM 08-28-2003:
i have a kinda kooky opinion about politics and bribes and she is making fun of me a little about it. i'm nice though, i dont cause trouble. i dont do personal attacks on peeps and i actually know a couple of you in real life. i just have some wack ass opinions. and i only discuss politics, i dont bug you about anything but politics, since i dont know most of you. |
|
| anotherben [email] said at 11:34 PM 08-28-2003:
you are ok in my book martin.
(i'd prefer if you sent cash or a money order for the agreed amount) |
martin said at 12:16 AM 08-29-2003:
thats nice of you to say, you but you are clearly a stooge for the corporate machine. i am not, and i can prove it. my favorite cannibal corpse song is "sentenced to burn". would a stooge of the fat cat republicans like cannibal corpse? nope. |
anotherben.. said at 9:49 AM 08-29-2003:
you wound me martin. |
|
| josh [email] said at 9:34 AM 08-29-2003:
I have no problem with you, Martin, either. You make me roll my eyes sometimes but that's really not a big deal. |
|
| shelly [email] said at 2:19 PM 09-03-2003:
no, i really did want to know your opinion about politics and bribes. is it in a thread i missed somewhere? |
|
| shelly [email] said at 4:57 PM 09-03-2003:
never mind, found it, duh. |
Shell said at 5:06 PM 09-03-2003:
Guess you don't need that email I sent, then, huh? |
bradley said at 2:44 PM 08-28-2003:
This dude must have been really bad, since I haven't been blocked yet. |
|
| josh [email] said at 3:23 PM 08-28-2003:
To my knowledge you don't post purely personal diatribes with lots of cursing and so forth. Usually you are just sarcastic. |
|
| brandon [email] said at 3:14 PM 08-28-2003:
Let's block bradley, too. While we're in the blocking mood. |
Michael said at 3:25 PM 08-28-2003:
Nah, cuz after Bradley it would be me, then down the line, it would turn into a damn witch hunt. 'What else floats in water? Bread? Churches? Very small rocks!' |
bradley said at 4:49 PM 08-28-2003:
I got something for you to block, skater boy. |
|
| brandon [email] said at 5:07 PM 08-28-2003:
Yes, it's true. I fucked Avril Lavigne and she wrote a song about it. I would've mentioned it earlier, but I was bashful. Who do you think taught me the sbarro(tm) method?
http://www.killoggs.com/log/post/2593036 |
|
| brandon [email] said at 5:40 PM 08-28-2003:
What's the best thing about fucking Avril Lavigne?
After you're done, you can flip her over and pretend that you're fucking a school boy on the playing fields of Eton |
Randy [ url ]
said at 5:53 PM 08-28-2003:
YAY!!! |
|
| rick [email] said at 3:37 PM 08-28-2003:
When he has prostrated himself and sincerely apologized, then made the $100 dollar donation to Planned Parenthood, then bought Rick an El Camino with an airbrushed sunset on the side and the airbrushed words "Old Skulin'" on the back and a bumper sticker that reads "Don't Cry Girls; I'll Be Back," then I think he can be let back on.But seriously, he needs to make a sincere apology. Nasty personal attacks are uncalled for, whatever the medium may be. |
 | courtney [email] said at 12:34 AM 08-29-2003:
prostrated or castrated? |
 | zack [email] said at 3:57 PM 08-28-2003:
I don't see the point.. He just seems like your garden variety troll with an axe to grind. |
 | loren [email] said at 4:46 PM 08-28-2003:
i say yes. nothing like reading you folks argue over dumb shite. |
|
| josh [email] said at 5:32 PM 08-28-2003:
HAHAHA |
|
| courtney [email] said at 12:35 AM 08-29-2003:
nothin' like a little shit stirrin' to make people come on down and read your site.
drama is what makes a blog or web community. don't leave home without it. |
|
| andy [email] said at 5:12 PM 08-28-2003:
Fuck that guy. I vote NO. Even if he did identify my worm. |
|
| milky [email] said at 5:49 PM 08-28-2003:
I have a novel idea: What say we call true/peace/bury the hatchet on all past and present killoggs feuds/fuck-yoose/on killoggs and off. Everybody starts from now on with a clean slate. This negative shit ain't healthy. Yeah, we can disagree on stuff, but let's leave it at that. Once it starts getting personal, it's not useful OR constructive.
Any takers on that? |
|
| brandon [email] said at 5:52 PM 08-28-2003:
That's a horrible idea. Fuck you, Milky, fuck you for even mentioning it |
|
| milky [email] said at 5:55 PM 08-28-2003:
Dude, I didn't mean YOU! But eh, it was just an idea. I'm 27. I'm not up to the levels of piss/vinegar/trash-talking I used to be. And I don't wanna be, either. But you know, fuck you too. :) |
|
| brandon [email] said at 10:00 PM 08-28-2003:
Yeah, Yeah, well fuck you, too, fuck you in the eye!
I think the argument for blocking Wade is simply this:
(1) He took liberties to quickly and too fast with insulting people. (2) He started in with the "Mary is ugly" shit which is both mean-spirited and unlike most of the other stuff that has gotten bandied around lately. Yes, many, many worse things have been said here. And I was the perpetrator of probably the worst and most uncalled for slanders. But I was also (1) on drugs (2) on drugs.
So, in conclusion, block the clown. Referring someone to some absurd and grotesque action is one thing. Or blatantly telling someone to go fuck themselves like I told Dianne the other day, and she was like "fuck you, too," and like moments ago when I recommended that Milky go fuck himself and he responded in kind. That's fine, because that's playful.
But this, you know, mean, unprovoked shit cannot abide. It cannot a-bide. |
Randy [ url ]
said at 9:35 AM 08-29-2003:
No offense, Jeff, but this post seems pretty ironic after reading what was posted higher up on the page between you & anotherben. |
|
| milky [email] said at 11:20 AM 08-29-2003:
I posted it to try and quash any future stuff. But, you know, I guess the "pathetic jackass" comment was needed to throw this idea out the window. Who knew? I'd already talked to wade who more than likely talked to ben, in private, before ben wanted toi flex nuts. Fine with me. I was waving "truce! truce!" before someone decided they wanted to ring the bell. I e-mailed wade, we talked, it sounded cool, but I guess it wasn't good enough. |
 | kiche [email] said at 8:14 PM 08-28-2003:
i second brandon. |
|
| zack [email] said at 8:30 PM 08-28-2003:
third. FUEDS FOREVER!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| andy [email] said at 8:44 PM 08-28-2003:
Y'all suck. |
|
| andy [email] said at 2:43 AM 08-29-2003:
Fuck this site. I can't believe there is even a question about whether this guy gets blocked or not. I can't believe that some people won't even back up friends on this site that were attacked by some mysoginist fuck. And then when people are trying to be constructive, people tell them to fuck off too. It took me a while to come back and post on this site because of dumb shit like this. Now that I am back I realize why I stopped posting in the first place. And of course, all of you will have your turns at responding to this with words you would never say in front of other people. Oh well. To the majority of you, have a nice life. To those I consider friends, talk to you soon. |
|
| zack [email] said at 3:27 AM 08-29-2003:
awww andy, I don;t think there's any real animosity here!!! don;'t leave baby..
i was just joking about the feuds... |
|
| josh [email] said at 9:55 AM 08-29-2003:
Aw, don't forsake us, Andy. |
bradley said at 11:01 AM 08-29-2003:
Andy, you are obviously a racist. |
|
| kiche [email] said at 3:05 PM 08-29-2003:
for once i agree with bradley.
but seriously andy, can't you take our obnoxious jokes? |
bradley said at 3:19 PM 08-29-2003:
kiche, I love you. |
|
| josh [email] said at 9:32 AM 08-29-2003:
Sorry, I never changed the thing so Wade could post. Had a busy day yesterday.
My take on it is that anyone who is not a head will get blocked if they post personal attacks against killoggs members, unless that person finds it funny or pretty much asked for it (like Brandon usually does by pre-emptively attacking people).
This never happened before because I hadn't written the code to do it til recently. And, honestly, there wasn't as much as a problem until recently. |
|
| josh [email] said at 9:36 AM 08-29-2003:
I guess I should add that they'll get blocked if they do it repeatedly. |
Woody said at 10:49 AM 08-29-2003:
Now wait, I want to get this straight. Do I get one freebie against each person? Or is it one freebie for the whole lot of you. And does the counter reset every January 1st, or what? I need to know. |
|
| milky [email] said at 11:17 AM 08-29-2003:
You can take some wails on me. I really lashed at you when you showed up and I have it coming. |
Woody said at 12:18 PM 08-29-2003:
I know now you were just a jealous Closet-Canuck. Plus you sent me postcards which was quite nice. Hmm, I still have to send you something. |
|
| milky [email] said at 12:30 PM 08-29-2003:
I don't meet the residency requirements and I have to exist for four years more because I have a record.
BUT-- I have French proficiency.
I checked the requirements some time ago. I know why you like Canada. Heck, if i could be a citizen tomorrow, I'd be already packed up. |
|
| josh [email] said at 9:40 AM 08-29-2003:
Oh yeah - sounds like you didn't make the cut, Wade. |
Emmaleigh said at 12:58 PM 08-29-2003:
man, too busy to check killoggs for a couple of days and all hell breaks loose. |
Lisa T. said at 3:12 PM 08-29-2003:
hehe. i was just thinking the same thing. |
|
| ed [email] said at 1:16 PM 08-29-2003:
PS - Having caught up and seen the beginning of this firestorm now, I'd have to vote with most of my esteemed colleagues. Killogs doesn't need Wade. I see no reason why Wade needs Killoggs. Occasionally misbehaving is human, and understandable. Deliberate and repeated personal attacks, however, are uncalled for. I'm sure there are other outlets that Wade can find for his bile.
I don't harbor any ill will towards Wade - I just think Killoggs can do without his brand of posting. |
bradley said at 1:21 PM 08-29-2003:
I don't harbor any ill will towards Wade
Quit being such a puss, Ed. You can't be nice to and liked by everyone.
Fuck you Wade. Yer a cock-chugger. From one troll to another. |
 | evan [email] said at 1:34 PM 08-29-2003:
a cock chugger... how nice and homophobic... i'm glad killoggs is full of open minded and enlightened individuals acting like the mature adults they are... |
|
| milky [email] said at 2:03 PM 08-29-2003:
i don't want to start an argument, but i was under the impression that "cock chugger" was an equal opportunity insult. |
|
| mary [email] said at 2:54 PM 08-29-2003:
The base of it though is hatred of women or gays.
It seems the worst insult you can give a guy is to liken him to a woman, or a gay man. |
meenk said at 5:31 PM 08-30-2003:
I don't think most men, when being called cocksuckers or cockshuggers feel that they are being likened to women, at all. I think they dislike it because of the homosexual connotation. If you called a man something which was uniquely female, with no homosexual connotation (hard to do, considering feminizing a man usually has homosexuality implied in most people's minds) they would be far less insulted, if at all. The characterization of homosexuals as feminine did once have a direct relationship to the way women used to be, but in this day and age, gay men have a femininity all their own, which has nothing to do with women. Men like women who are cocksuckers. |
Randy [ url ]
said at 3:16 PM 08-29-2003:
Yeah, I think it's when you replace the word "sucker" with "chugger" that the line is crossed. |
|
| milky [email] said at 3:54 PM 08-29-2003:
OK. That was the point I was confused on. I know '____sucker' is used by both sexes indescriminately. |
|
| kiche [email] said at 3:06 PM 08-29-2003:
cock chugger. |
bradley said at 3:17 PM 08-29-2003:
I'm glad you're glad. One big happy colon-cowboy festival. |
|
| ed [email] said at 5:13 PM 08-30-2003:
I can either be nice to people, or I can ignore them. Being nice is the alternative I choose most often because I happen to like it. Having a positive outlook helps me feel good. If that makes me a "puss" then so be it.
I have no illusions of or aspirations to being "liked by everyone." I'm just me. If that bothers other people, it's their issue, not mine. |
|
| mary [email] said at 1:59 PM 08-29-2003:
Good job, guys. Andy was one of the coolest posters on here. And a longtime good friend of Josh's. |
eveon said at 2:09 PM 08-29-2003:
i'm eating waffle fries while reading these posts. man, these fries never tasted so good...i'm so out of the loop. who the fuck is wade? why are hispanics called swimmers?? evan wants to kiss a schoolboy?? someone fill me in. |
the news said at 5:33 PM 08-29-2003:
*News Update*
*Voiceover* What some are calling the race for freedom, and others are calling the race for mayhem and destruction, the "wade is a cocksucking shitbird vote of 2003" is, if nothing else, a test of the values and principles that make up the very heart of the killoggs community.
Although it is still early in the race, MNN has gathered some preliminary results from its affiliates and secret agents. Of the 71 precincts, 9 precicnts, or 13%, are now closed, and although the results are still yet unofficial, we at MNN feel confident in reporting that 7 precicnts voted categorically and unequivocally to "burn the cocksucking shitbird at the stake", while 2 precincts voted to "set the cocksucking shitbird free".
Other precincts are reporting as well, but the results are yet unclear. Our corespondent and anchorman, MeanMeanMonky, is on site just outside the Cowart compound in the piney woods of livingston parish, and has this report:
MeanMeanMonky: "Thank you monobrow. We are just outside the fortified compound of the Cowart family, located in the piney woods of livingston parish. We are waiting for a statement from Wade, who, as most viewers are aware, stirred up quite a fray recently with his remarks from the floor of the inner chamber of the killoggs community. Earlier this morning, at about 8AM, we spotted wade and several other gentleman of obvious distinction and good breeding returning from a bird hunt, and although we were too far away to engage in meaningful dialogue about the vote, I must say he did look magnificent in his english hunting vest and he did pose for a few shots. After that..."
Monobrow: "Ah MMM, you said he posed for a few shots? Can you elaborate on that? We havent seen or heard much from him."
MeanMeanMonky: "Yes, in fact he did, and it was quite interesting. His assistants apparently let him know we were on the perimeter of the compound and he decided to make the most of it. He stopped and breached his antique english over-under, spit something out of his mouth that apparently was a large chew, handed a string of birds to one of the entourage and waved and smiled for the cameras for several minutes. But as I said, Monobrow, we were out of earshot."
Monobrow: "That is unfortunate. Many people are waiting to hear his comments on the vote. Do you expect to hear from him anytime soon? Did he do anything else?"
MeanMeanMonky: "Well, at the end of the shoot he did something that was a bit, unusual, at least I find it unusual, given the circumstances he faces and the adversity that was welled up in the killoggs inner chamber. He err, he uh... He blew us kisses. Several. Very strange. And his eye twinkled"
Monobrow: "Well, that isnt entirely unheard of. Candidates and political outcasts of all types, refuges and fugitives, have on occasion in the past chosen gestures that symbolize their cause. The double V or clenched fists come to mind. It has served to garner political and moral support for politicians and persecuted alike in the past, and helped to galvanize the myth of their struggle. Do you have any information on the symbolism associated with these kisses? Any metaphor at all?"
MeanMeanMonky. "Well, Monobrow, no we don't. After the kisses, one of the gentleman hunting with Mr.. Wade, who turned out to be none-other than the highly esteemed james carville walked over and announced that he was managing things for Mr.. Cowart from here on out. Of course everyone in these parts knows the Carvilles and Cowarts go way back. He spoke for only a few minutes and fielded no questions, but as he was walking away someone did get his attention with a question about the kisses. I must say that moment was both entertaining and mysterious. Mr.. Carville turned around briskly in his tracks and raised his hands in a sort of disbelief and a style that only he can summon and said, and I quote now: "Those are butterfly kisses son! Butterfly Kisses!" Of course, as soon as our analysts can determine the meaning of this gesture we will let the viewers know.
Monobrow: "Did Carville have anything else to say? You said he spoke for several minutes."
MeanMeanMonky: "Well, he did comment on the precinct results that have been reported. Aside from the closed precincts, the 13%, he stated that the results that were trickling in from other precincts should be watched closely. By his calculation, and these are his figures, currently an additional 6 reporting precincts can go "either way", while two precincts are "contingency yes" precincts. Of course that makes things interesting, because if Wade can sway voters in the "either way" category, or garner more contingency votes, its an even race, a barn burner. Carville also reminded us that only %13 percent of the vote was in, and that historically, Wade's staunchest supporters were those who were out doing something of substance and significance with their lives, and had not yet had a chance to cast their vote. "
Monobrow: "Yes our analysts here at the network have made the same determination. Did he say anything about florida or the other networks who have called the race already, at such an early stage?"
MeanMeanMonky: "Well he did say, and this was the last thing he said, he did say that the entire vote was too close to call, and that although florida precincts looked rather bleak in the results so far, he felt that to call the election based on the florida results exclusively or any other incomplete results, as other networks have done, could only be an act attributed to, and again, i quote Mr.. Carville here: "i reckon that's the yellow bellied liberal media who like to control the minds of the public and disenfranchise voters who have yet to even vote, son. To call the election in general or in a given state such as florida is none other than the impetuous act of an irresponsible asshole who should be strung up. We know a little math down in these here parts of the country and I sure know politics. I mean, hell, we have ridden this rodeo before havent we?" So, Mr.. Carville feels strongly that the vote should not be called, and further, if I heard him correctly, he gave the impression that even Florida, with it's two precincts currently reporting, might still be up in the air once official votes are in. Should be interesting for sure. Back to you monobrow.
Monobrow: "MeanMeanMonky reporting live from the Cowart compound in the pri | |
| |
