To the FUCKING COCKSUCKER who just posted a bazillion copies of that 20 K gif animation in RUTHLESS. Not only did you cause me to lose information when my system just froze up. But you've effectively sealed off the club from anyone else who wants to view it, unless you turn off viewing images, which is annoying. JOSH, would you please erase that entry and make sure that the FUCKING IDIOT who posted that shit loses his picture posting privileges.
jake [email] said at 8:18 PM 01-31-2005: Geez Brandon I'm sorry about that.
I previewed it a couple times, but oh well.
It's off the page now.
I guess that's the way love goes.
brandon [email] said at 1:49 AM 02-01-2005: There shall come a day when the men of the North shall toss off their subjugation to the systematics of the 12 bankers and their masonic bag-men. On that day, when we take aim upon the last feral Cush skull by means of deadly methods unknown to anyone outside whispering circles, another adverbial phrase, I shall have my sweet revenge.
jake [email] said at 2:31 AM 02-01-2005: Or I could, y'know, buy you a boddington's, and give you a couple of singles to stuff in the waitress' décolletage. Whatev.
zack [email] said at 5:40 AM 02-01-2005: can we get a posting of the gif ONE time, here? i was curious to see it but my computer blew up trying to look at 181290381209 of them.
brandon [email] said at 8:33 AM 02-01-2005: Basically, it was some kind of Jewish creature - I say it was Jewish because it had all kinds of tentacles for reaching into your pocket-book and extracting usury. And it had a huge nose.
julie [email] said at 9:40 AM 02-01-2005: I posted the tentacle creature in Ruthless as a present for Craig. Sorry someone else had to go and ruin it for you. I don't even know how to enlarge a gif.
brandon [email] said at 10:37 AM 02-01-2005: No, that was Jake, apparently - and I really did lose a lot of unsaved information. But the outrage was all faux.
jake [email] said at 11:49 AM 02-01-2005: Yep, it was me.
I thought since I previewed it, that it wasn't too big of a burden, but I guess my work computer is higher performing than I thought.
ed [email] said at 1:27 PM 02-07-2005: No, you misunderstand. My sublime was not in response to Josh's action (although I certainly understand it). It was in response to Brandon's statement. And if you weren't here in that chaotic 5-10 minutes, you wouldn't know just how right I am.
Michael Knighten said at 2:13 PM 02-07-2005: whoa, how come I can respond now, but I couldn't the other day? I tried to respond to Woody's thing about traveling to SF and Boulder and it wouldn't let me...